🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed ruling, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include several five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its ruling.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action occurs during a nationwide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision happens after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic representatives decried the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

Another senior Democratic leader argued the court had once again damaged its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.