🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."