🔗 Share this article

This revolution isn't televised, yet it might possess webbed feet and large eyes.

It also might feature the horn of a unicorn or the plumage of a chicken.

Whilst rallies against the leadership carry on in US cities, demonstrators are utilizing the spirit of a local block party. They've offered dance instruction, handed out treats, and performed on unicycles, as police look on.

Combining humour and political action – a tactic social scientists term "tactical frivolity" – isn't novel. But it has become a hallmark of protests in the United States in this period, used by various groups.

A specific icon has emerged as especially powerful – the frog. It started when a video of an encounter between a protester in an inflatable frog and immigration enforcement agents in Portland, Oregon, spread online. It subsequently appeared to rallies across the country.

"There's a lot going on with that little frog costume," says LM Bogad, a professor at University of California, Davis and a Guggenheim Fellow who specialises in performance art.

The Path From Pepe to the Streets of Portland

It is difficult to talk about protests and frogs without mentioning Pepe, an illustrated figure co-opted by online communities throughout a political race.

As this image initially spread on the internet, it was used to express certain emotions. Afterwards, it was deployed to express backing for a political figure, including a particular image shared by the candidate himself, portraying Pepe with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

Pepe was also depicted in certain internet forums in darker contexts, portrayed as a hate group member. Participants exchanged "rare Pepes" and established cryptocurrency in his name. His catchphrase, "feels good, man", became a coded signal.

Yet Pepe didn't start out as a political symbol.

Its creator, the illustrator, has stated about his disapproval for its appropriation. Pepe was supposed to be simply a relaxed amphibian in his comic world.

This character debuted in a series of comics in the mid-2000s – apolitical and notable for a quirky behavior. A film, which chronicles Mr Furie's efforts to wrest back control of his work, he stated his drawing came from his life with companions.

As he started out, the artist experimented with uploading his work to the nascent social web, where the community began to copy, alter, and reinterpret his character. When the meme proliferated into darker parts of online spaces, Mr Furie attempted to distance himself from his creation, even killing him off in a comic strip.

Yet the frog persisted.

"It proves that we don't control imagery," states the professor. "They transform and be repurposed."

Previously, the popularity of this meme meant that frogs were largely associated with conservative politics. A transformation occurred on a day in October, when a viral moment between a protestor wearing an inflatable frog costume and a federal agent in Portland, Oregon captured global attention.

The moment came just days after a decision to deploy the National Guard to Portland, which was called "war-ravaged". Demonstrators began to gather in droves outside a facility, near a federal building.

Emotions ran high and an agent deployed a chemical agent at the individual, directing it into the air intake fan of the inflatable suit.

The protester, the man in the costume, quipped, saying it tasted like "something milder". But the incident spread everywhere.

The frog suit was not too unusual for Portland, renowned for its unconventional spirit and activist demonstrations that revel in the ridiculous – outdoor exercise, retro fitness classes, and nude cycling groups. The city's unofficial motto is "Embrace the Strange."

The costume was also referenced in the ensuing legal battle between the federal government and Portland, which claimed the use of troops was unlawful.

While the court ruled that month that the president had the right to send personnel, a dissenting judge wrote, noting in her opinion demonstrators' "known tendency for donning inflatable costumes while voicing their disagreement."

"Observers may be tempted the court's opinion, which adopts the government's characterization as a war zone, as simply ridiculous," the dissenting judge stated. "But today's decision has serious implications."

The order was halted by courts subsequently, and personnel withdrew from the area.

But by then, the amphibian costume was now a significant protest icon for progressive movements.

The inflatable suit was seen nationwide at anti-authoritarian protests recently. There were frogs – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in major US cities. They appeared in small towns and big international cities like Tokyo and London.

This item was sold out on online retailers, and saw its cost increase.

Shaping the Narrative

The link between both frogs together – lies in the dynamic between the silly, innocent image and underlying political significance. Experts call this "tactical frivolity."

The tactic relies on what the professor terms a "disarming display" – often silly, it acts as a "appealing and non-threatening" performance that draws focus to your ideas without directly articulating them. It's the goofy costume you wear, or the meme circulated.

Mr Bogad is an analyst in the subject and an experienced participant. He authored a text called 'Tactical Performance', and taught workshops internationally.

"One can look back to the Middle Ages – when people are dominated, they use absurdity to express dissent indirectly and while maintaining a layer of protection."

The purpose of this approach is multi-faceted, he says.

As activists take on the state, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences